Post by themnax on Oct 29, 2003 21:23:16 GMT
this as i see it is a thing very much open to question
as is any real need for it to exist
now i realize it does so to fill the vacume created by the
unwillingness and inability of some awairnessess to resist
the desire to exert an undue influence over one another
a seduction i make no claim to being imune to the pull of
yet here we are at the very heart of the matter
the heart of the beast as it were
my thoughts are that life as most of us have come to take for
granted in this 'civilized' age, rests very heavily upon the
existence of certain physical infrastructures
and certainly granted some mechanism within them is neccessary
to their creation and maintainence
but what of general governance?
do we truely need a king or a parlement
a president a politbeaurough or whathaveyou?
and if a muliti-tierd system of nation, states, counties, and 'cities'
is good for a soverign nation
provided it can fairly represent its diversity
what about a next level, a planetary level to give international
law real teath?
i'm not claiming to have all the answered
but even blind man could see that the current state of affairs
is, to put it kindly, somewhat flawed.
grossly flawed when one nation, because it is so much more
powerful then others militarily, can arbitrarily impose its
will for its own profit and convenience and dam the consiquences
to anyone else or even itself, on another halfway arround the globe from itself, without so much as a by your leave,
to the rest of humanity
=^^=
.../\...
as is any real need for it to exist
now i realize it does so to fill the vacume created by the
unwillingness and inability of some awairnessess to resist
the desire to exert an undue influence over one another
a seduction i make no claim to being imune to the pull of
yet here we are at the very heart of the matter
the heart of the beast as it were
my thoughts are that life as most of us have come to take for
granted in this 'civilized' age, rests very heavily upon the
existence of certain physical infrastructures
and certainly granted some mechanism within them is neccessary
to their creation and maintainence
but what of general governance?
do we truely need a king or a parlement
a president a politbeaurough or whathaveyou?
and if a muliti-tierd system of nation, states, counties, and 'cities'
is good for a soverign nation
provided it can fairly represent its diversity
what about a next level, a planetary level to give international
law real teath?
i'm not claiming to have all the answered
but even blind man could see that the current state of affairs
is, to put it kindly, somewhat flawed.
grossly flawed when one nation, because it is so much more
powerful then others militarily, can arbitrarily impose its
will for its own profit and convenience and dam the consiquences
to anyone else or even itself, on another halfway arround the globe from itself, without so much as a by your leave,
to the rest of humanity
=^^=
.../\...